Updated Nov 4, 2026FDA and CMS public dataIndependent · free · not health advice
GxRadar
Law, patents & policy · Explainer

Patent thickets, evergreening and the Orange Book

How secondary patents pile up around brand drugs, which ones FDA lets companies list, what the October 2026 patent data show, and what regulators and courts did about improper listings.

Not health advice. GxRadar is for general information only. Nothing here is medical, pharmacy, legal or financial advice. Do not start, stop or change any medicine based on this site. Talk to your pharmacist or prescriber about your own situation.

As of October 9, 2026, FDA's Orange Book listed 148 separate patents against a single brand application, an extended-release tablet that combines two long-marketed medicines, bupropion and dextromethorphan. Across all 1,348 brand applications with any patents listed, the median was four. The figures come from GxRadar's analysis of FDA's Orange Book data files1.

Long lists like that one are what critics mean by a patent thicket, many overlapping patents on one product covering formulations, dosing, uses and delivery devices, often issued years after first approval. Evergreening is the related practice of adding newer patents to an old product so that protection outlasts the original patent. Since 2023 the Federal Trade Commission has formally disputed hundreds of Orange Book listings it considered improper, and in December 2025 one manufacturer removed more than 200 of them.

A listed patent matters because of what it sets in motion for generic competitors. Every generic applicant must answer it, and a timely lawsuit over it can hold up generic approval for 30 months. The FTC, a federal appeals court and the patent office have each pushed on that system since 2023. Patents are not the only lever; brand owners can also file citizen petitions that FDA must answer before acting on some generics.

Which patents a brand may list with FDA

FDA's patent listing rule, 21 CFR 314.532, allows three kinds of patents: drug substance (active ingredient) patents, drug product (formulation and composition) patents, and method-of-use patents. The rule also names what does not qualify: "Process patents, patents claiming packaging, patents claiming metabolites, and patents claiming intermediates are not covered by this section, and information on these patents must not be submitted to FDA." Brands file patent information on a declaration form within 30 days of approval, or within 30 days of a new patent issuing.

FDA publishes what it receives without checking whether the patent claims match those categories. In a 2022 Federal Register notice3, the patent office put it this way: "The FDA has a ministerial role with regard to the patent listing provisions." A drug can therefore accumulate listings over its whole life, and each one carries legal weight.

A generic applicant has to file a certification for each listed patent, and the riskiest choice, a Paragraph IV certification that the patent is invalid or not infringed, invites a lawsuit. Under FDA's rules, a suit filed within 45 days over a patent that was listed before the generic application was submitted blocks FDA from making approval effective for 30 months. Patents listed later can still be litigated, but they do not trigger that automatic stay. Our explainer on the Orange Book covers the rest of the publication, and the glossary defines its terms.

Congress tightened one part of the system in the Orange Book Transparency Act of 20204, signed January 5, 2021. When a court or the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issues a final decision cancelling or invalidating a listed patent's claims, the brand must notify FDA within 14 days and ask that the listing be amended or withdrawn.

What the patent list looks like in 2026

GxRadar counted every patent-application pair in FDA's October 9, 2026, patent file and found 8,861 listings of 7,134 distinct patents across 1,348 brand applications. A small group of products carries a large share of them. The 262 applications with 10 or more patents account for 4,844 listings, or 55 percent of the total.

Measure (Orange Book patent file, October 2026)CountShare
Brand applications (NDAs) with at least one listed patent1,348100%
Applications with 2 or more patents1,11583%
Applications with 5 or more patents62847%
Applications with 10 or more patents26219%
Applications with 20 or more patents745%
Applications with 30 or more patents292%
Applications listing no patent flagged as claiming the active ingredient74956%
Median patents per application4
Most patents on one application148

FDA's file flags each listing by the type of claim the brand declared. Of the 8,861 listings, 1,574 (18 percent) were flagged as claiming the drug substance. Another 3,029 (34 percent) were flagged as drug product patents without a substance flag, and 3,251 (37 percent) carried only a method-of-use code. The remaining 1,007 had no flag; FDA's data documentation explains that the flags apply to patents submitted on the current declaration form and listed after August 18, 2003. More than half of the applications on the list, 749 of 1,348, had no patent flagged as covering the active ingredient at all.

None of that proves a listing is improper. Formulation and use patents are legitimate when they meet the rule, though they are the ones usually called secondary because they tend to issue after the compound patent. A 2018 study in the Journal of Law and the Biosciences5 that examined all drugs on the market from 2005 to 2015 found that "78 percent of the drugs associated with new patents in the FDA's records were not new drugs coming on the market, but existing drugs."

The FTC's challenges to improper listings

Its recent campaign began with a September 2023 policy statement6. It warned that a brand that improperly lists a patent "may benefit from a 30-month stay of FDA approval of generic drug applications," regardless of whether a court ultimately finds the patent valid or infringed, and that the practice "may constitute an unfair method of competition in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act." The statement said the FTC could use FDA's own dispute procedure under 21 CFR 314.53(f).

That procedure lets anyone challenge a listing. As the FTC has described it8, FDA forwards the dispute to the brand, which has 30 days to withdraw or amend the listing or to certify, under penalty of perjury, that it is correct. FDA does not decide who is right, and a brand that certifies its listing keeps it.

DateActionScale
September 2023FTC policy statement on improper Orange Book listingsWarns that improper listing may be an unfair method of competition
November 7, 2023FTC disputes listings through FDA and sends warning lettersMore than 100 patents, 10 companies
April 30, 2024Second roundMore than 300 listings on 20 brand products, 10 companies
December 20, 2024Federal Circuit ruling on device patentsPatent must claim at least the active ingredient to be listed
May 21, 2025Third roundMore than 200 listings on 17 brand products, 7 companies
December 2025One manufacturer removes listingsMore than 200 listings on more than 30 products

FTC staff then used the process in waves. Its first round, in November 2023, covered more than 100 patents. In April 20247 it disputed more than 300 listings across 20 brand products, among them injectable diabetes and weight-loss drugs, inhalers and a glucagon nasal spray, and said four entities had delisted patents after the first round. The May 2025 round challenged more than 200 device patent listings on 17 products and said earlier efforts had led to delistings across 22 brand products.

On December 20, 2024, the Federal Circuit affirmed9 an order requiring a brand to delist inhaler patents. "To claim that drug, the patent must claim at least the active ingredient," the court wrote, so "patents claiming just the device components of the product approved in an NDA do not meet the listing requirement." In December 2025, the FTC announced that a manufacturer had requested removal of more than 200 listings covering more than 30 asthma, diabetes and COPD drugs and epinephrine autoinjectors.

What the patent office and FDA have done

Patent office and FDA officials started formal talks after a July 2021 executive order on competition. FDA sent the patent office a letter in September 2021, the patent office replied in July 2022, and a November 2022 notice3 announced a joint public listening session, held January 19, 2023, on ways to keep the patent system from "unjustifiably" delaying generic and biosimilar competition.

Next the patent office took aim at a building block of many thickets. Patents on obvious variants of an earlier invention are often allowed only if the owner files a terminal disclaimer, which ties the later patent's term to the earlier one. A May 2024 proposed rule10 would have made patents tied together this way unenforceable if any one of them had a claim finally held invalid as anticipated or obvious. The office said the change was meant "to prevent multiple patents directed to obvious variants of an invention from potentially deterring competition." It withdrew the proposal12 in December 2024 after receiving more than 300 comments.

On FDA's side, a March 2023 GAO report11 found no consensus among 15 stakeholders on whether device patent listings delay generic drug-device products, though 13 of them said it would help for FDA to clarify which device-related patents belong on the list. GAO reported that FDA planned a workgroup to consider that question. Device-heavy products such as inhalers are a large part of why some complex generics still have few or no copies.

Patent disputes over these products often end in settlements, covered in our piece on pay-for-delay settlements. Exclusivity periods such as 180-day first-filer exclusivity layer on top of the patent list. Generics that clear FDA review while listed patents remain in force get tentative approval instead of final approval.

FDA posts a refreshed patent file1 every month. The question GAO raised in 2023 is only partly settled. The 2024 ruling established that a patent claiming only device parts cannot be listed; the court said it did not need to reach a further argument about drug substance and drug product patents, leaving open the status of patents that claim a device together with its drug.

Sources and notes

  1. FDA (2026). Orange Book Data Files (patent file dated October 9, 2026)
    www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/orange-book-data-files
  2. eCFR (2026). 21 CFR 314.53, Submission of patent information
    www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-D/part-314/subpart-B/section-314.53
  3. USPTO (2022). Joint USPTO-FDA Collaboration Initiatives; Notice of Public Listening Session, Federal Register
    public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2022-24107.pdf
  4. Public Law 116-290 (2021). Orange Book Transparency Act of 2020
    www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-116publ290/html/PLAW-116publ290.htm
  5. Journal of Law and the Biosciences (2018). May your drug price be evergreen
    pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6534750
  6. FTC (2023). Statement Concerning Brand Drug Manufacturers' Improper Listing of Patents in the Orange Book
    www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/p239900orangebookpolicystatement092023.pdf
  7. FTC (2024). FTC Expands Patent Listing Challenges, Targeting More Than 300 Junk Listings
    www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/04/ftc-expands-patent-listing-challenges-
  8. FTC (2025). FTC Renews Challenge of More Than 200 Improper Patent Listings
    www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/05/ftc-renews-challenge-more-200-improper
  9. US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (2024). Opinion, No. 24-1936
    www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/24-1936.OPINION.12-20-2024_2439730.pdf
  10. USPTO via GovInfo (2024). Terminal Disclaimer Practice To Obviate Nonstatutory Double Patenting, proposed rule
    www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-05-10/html/2024-10166.htm
  11. GAO (2023). Generic Drugs: Stakeholder Views on Improving FDA's Information on Patents, GAO-23-105477
    www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-105477
  12. USPTO via GovInfo (2024). Terminal Disclaimer Practice To Obviate Nonstatutory Double Patenting; Withdrawal
    www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-12-04/html/2024-28263.htm

Superscript numbers in the text link to these sources. GxRadar data (NADAC histories, recall and shortage counts) come from CMS and FDA files described on the sources page. Researched and drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. Information current as of Nov 3, 2026 and may change. Spot an error? It will be corrected once confirmed.

Not health advice. GxRadar is for general information only. Nothing here is medical, pharmacy, legal or financial advice. Do not start, stop or change any medicine based on this site. Talk to your pharmacist or prescriber about your own situation. Laws, prices and program rules described here can change; confirm current details with the official source.